In speaking of the see, judge, act method, Pope John XXIII was drawing on the thought of the Belgian Cardinal Joseph Cardijn (1882–1967), who as a priest had ministered to poor workers and founded the Young Christian Workers. Cardinal Cardijn, one of the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council, spoke on the document that was to be promulgated as the Declaration on Religious Freedom. Religious freedom, he said, ‘is not an end in itself. It is a necessary means for education in freedom in its fullest sense, which leads to interior freedom’.
This interior freedom, even if it exists in germ as a natural gift in every human creature, requires a long education which can be summarised in three words: see, judge and act.*
The process of the pastoral cycle has become a potent way of reading the signs of the time and engaging in action for justice in a way that is transformative.
What is happening?
Who are the people involved?
Who gains from this situation? Who loses?
What is the situation doing to people?
Why is it happening? Why does it continue?
Notes:
Seeing, hearing, and experiencing the lived reality of individuals and communities.
Naming what is happening that causes you concern
Carefully and intentionally examining the primary data of the situation. What are the people in this situation doing, feeling, and saying? What is happening to them and how do you/they respond?
How do you feel about this situation?
Have you ever behaved or acted like anyone in the situation? If so, what happened? Why? How did you and/or those involved feel?
What do you think should be happening?
What does your faith say about it?
What does our Vincentian Tradition say about it?
Notes:
The word ‘judge’ is used here in a positive sense – to analyse the situation and make an informed judgement about it.
This involves two key parts:
A. social analysis
B. theological reflection.
What can we do to bridge the gap between what is happening (the reality) and what should be happening (the ideal/what our faith says)?
What action are we going to take?
Who can we involve in our action?
Notes:
Planning and carrying out actions aimed at transforming the social structures that contribute to suffering and injustice.
Step 1: SEE
What do you know about this issue or what did you observe?
What specific facts can you cite about this issue or experience?
What did you learn or observe?
How do you feel in the face of this issue or experience?
How does it touch you personally?
Step 2: JUDGE
Judging involves:
a. Social Analysis
Social analysis helps us to obtain a more complete picture of the social situation by exploring its historical and structural relationships. In this step, we attempt to make sense of the reality that was observed in Step 1.
Why does this situation exist?
What are the root causes?
To answer these questions, we need to examine:
Social Analysis assists us in naming the ‘heart of the matter’ which we then take to the theological reflection.
b. Theological Reflection
Theological Reflection explores the experience and its deeper analysis, in dialogue with the religious tradition.
From this conversation we gain new insights and meanings.
Two important sources of this tradition are the Scriptures and Catholic social teaching.
How do they serve as a measuring stick for this experience?
What Scripture passages can help us to interpret this experience?
How do biblical values us to see this reality in a different way?
What does Catholic social teaching say about this issue? What key principles from Catholic social teaching apply to this situation? (For example: human dignity, the common good, human rights, the option for the poor.)
Step 3: ACT
From your information (Seeing) ...
and analysis and theological reflection (Judging) ...
what action needs to be taken –
to change the situation?
to address root causes?
If no action is clear, what additional research is needed?
How would you transform the structures and relationships that produce this situation?
How can you act to empower those who are disadvantaged in this situation?
How will you evaluate the effectiveness of your action?
SEE
The SEE part requires that every member brings to the meeting, a ‘fact’ that he/
she will share with the rest of the group. A ‘fact’ is something that has happened
not imagined or predicted to happened and actually witnessed by a member. It
could be an incident, a remark overheard or an event witnessed by a member.
The member does not go looking for facts. The fact/s occurs in his normal day to
day living and working environment. This is called a person’s milieu. Every person
is involved with his ‘milieu of life’ and his/ her ‘milieu of work’.
The ‘milieu of life’ consists of all the various places and circumstances where the
member comes into contact with other people on a regular basis in living his daily
life. It could be the club where he hangs out after work, people he meets when he
goes to the market, people he meets or groups he may belong to in the parish or
the community, sports club or gym and so on. This is the ‘milieu of life’.
The other milieu that every member will be a part of and where he spends most
of his day is the ‘milieu of work’. Although the member may belong to a
workplace, be it a factory, office, shopping center and so on, he/ she does not
relate with everyone in the workplace equally. There is a group of people whom
he actually works with every day. His Immediate workmates or team. However,
during lunchtime, he/ she is always with another group of people. Then there is
clique of people he/ she meets everyday while waiting to take the bus every
morning. He could belong to a recreation club of the workplace where he has
another clique of friends or the union where he sometimes goes for a meeting
and he is close to a certain group of friends there. All this constitutes what we
call, ones ‘world of work’.
The ‘milieu of work’ and ‘milieu of life’ is very important to every member. This is
what we call his or her ‘sphere of influence’. This in the world is where you find
the people you can influence, change their attitudes or values. In this sense, you
are a leader. A leader is someone who has followers. These are the people whom
you will influence to follow you not because you have been elected as their leader
but because they are willing to follow your ideas, attitudes and values. This is
where you also find the facts to bring to your meeting.
The leader (you) needs to have a ‘keen sense of awareness’. He/ she is alive to
what is happening in one’s milieu and more importantly, what is happening in the
lives of the people in ones milieu. For this purpose, the leader earnestly tries to
enter into the lives of the people in ones milieu. This is a delicate undertaking and
some training on this could be helpful.
In deciding on whether to bring something one has seen, heard or experienced in
ones milieu, the key question to ask is ‘DOES THIS NEED LOOKING INTO?’
A fact is something a leader has seen, heard or experienced in one’s milieu. It
does not necessarily have to be a problem or bad incident. It could be just a
remark one overheard. For example, over tea time conversation, one of the
leaders friend commented that he has a big problem and does not know what to
do about it. He said that his 14 yr old son has been running away from school
often and the teachers want to see the parents about it. ‘What can I do? I beat
the hell out of him so many times and yet he continues to do it. What am I to tell
the teacher?’ Does this remark by the leaders fellow worker ‘needs looking into?’
The SEE-JUDGE-ACT is also what we call a ‘Review of Life’. It calls upon us to
review what is happening in the lives of our fellow workers or students. How do
we review a situation?
# We look at the cause of the situation. We need to find why the
student is running away from school? We don’t imagine the reasons. We actually
don’t know. So the first line of action at this point is to find out why the student is
running away from school. The group then helps the leader to strategize how he
is going to find this out from the student. You as a stranger simply cannot go and
ask him this question. You have to come up with a strategy on how to approach
him.
# We need to ask who are the various people involved in the situation. The
parents, the teachers, his friends, his parish (if he belongs to one)
# How many students are involved in this problem?
# We ask, what is the attitude of the people involved in the problem? What
are they saying? Here again, if we don’t know, we don’t suppose. We go and find
out.
# Finally, we ask ourselves, what are the consequences if nothing is done
about it?
JUDGE
When we say ‘leader’, we do not mean a political leader, a union leader, the
leader of a society and so on. We are talking about ‘Christian leadership and a
‘Christian leader’. Who is a Christian leader? If you want to know who is a
Christian leader, whom do we ask? Of course you have to ask Christ himself. How
does Christ describe the leader?
‘You are the light of the light of the world’……where there is darkness, you bring
light.
‘You are the salt of the earth’…….you bring taste/ richness to peoples dreary lives.
‘You are the leaven in the dough’…….you are not out there standing on a pedestal
but you are there ‘with them’ and ‘for them’ and you are immersed. You are ‘one
with them’.
You are the ‘sower’ who goes out to sow seeds. You understand that not every
seed you sow will take root. But you go out and sow anyway. You believe that
those that do, will yield a hundred fold.
You are the good shepherd. You are more concerned about the one sheep that is
lost and you will go all out to find it. I remember the case of a leader who
reported about one of his fellow workers who he came to know was ruining
himself and his family because of his gambling habit. He worked on him for a
quite a long time to turn him around and his team also helped him by giving him
ideas on what to do next. He was so happy with his new found life that he later
joined the team to help other people who were in the same situation as him.
This is why, we have ‘JUDGE’ after see because we are not social or political
leaders but we are Christian leaders and therefore we need to see ‘what Christ
would want us to do in a certain situation that we have seen to exist and we
believe ‘needs looking into’. This is where we may look into the bible to see what
Christ might have to say or we may even look into the teachings of the Church to
check what it has say about ‘human rights’ for example, if we are dealing with a
human rights issue.
ACT
To act is to ‘bear witness to the truth’. As Christian leaders, we are ‘called’ to bear
witness to the truth.
‘Not every one who calls me master, master is my servant. It is he who carries out
my will’.
‘For I was hungry and you gave me to eat ….’
Thirsty and you gave me to drink…
Naked and you clothed me…..
I was in prison and you visited me…..
Ignorant and you taught me the way…..
Distressed, and you came to my aid…..
He did not say ‘and you prayed for me’.
Our action starts when we go out and find out more about the fact or situation
being reviewed. Our action starts when we reach out to people and enter into
their lives and start to make the world a better place for them to live in.
Action sometimes calls for an effort to change people’s values and attitudes.
Action also sometimes goes beyond the current problem and looks at how to
prevent the situation or affect more people in the future.
In the case of the student who was running away from school, it was found that it
was because he could not keep up with school work because he had nobody to
help him as his parents could not afford to send him for tuition. The group in it’s
review also found out that there were many more students in the area who were
facing the same problem.
They worked with the students, parents, the school and the local parish and
organized free tuition classes with the help of volunteer teachers. Some were not
teachers but they could still teach as they were knowledgeable.
The parent of the student involved was so impressed that he joined the group and
later became an outstanding leader. He was not a Christian, but he fully
appreciated and accepted the teachings of Christ and practiced it in his life.
That's how the Street Dinner programme has been going on since 2018.
While the "pastoral cycle method" and the "see, judge, act" method are essentially the same concept, the pastoral cycle method is considered a more detailed and nuanced version of the "see, judge, act" approach, providing a deeper analysis and reflection on a situation before taking action, often incorporating elements like "social analysis" and "theological reflection" within its stages, whereas "see, judge, act" provides a simpler framework for initial observation, judgment, and action.
The pastoral cycle has four steps, or moments:
Experience: Define the focus of your reflection, which could be an incident in your life, a film, or something happening in your community.
Analysis: Ask questions about the causes of the issue, consequences, and key players.
Reflection: Reflect on the focus of the process in light of your religious resources.
Response: Draw on your learnings to discern actions that arise from God's activity.
The pastoral cycle is a theological act that involves putting faith into action, participating in building God's reign, and celebrating achievements. It's a process that's more like a spiral than a circle, leading individuals and communities deeper into applying their faith to social issues.
Key differences:
Depth of Analysis:
"See, judge, act" is a concise framework focusing on the basic steps of observing, analyzing, and taking action, while the pastoral cycle method delves deeper into each stage, including detailed analysis of the social structures and theological implications of a situation.
How they are similar:
Core principle:
Both methods emphasize the importance of carefully examining a situation before taking action, ensuring a well-informed response based on Christian values.
Application:
Both can be used to analyze social injustices and develop appropriate responses, whether in a community setting or individual reflection.
The parable of the Good Samaritan teaches that we should show compassion and love to everyone, regardless of their background or beliefs, essentially meaning "our neighbor" is anyone who needs help, even if they are considered an enemy or outsider, and we should actively help those in need without considering personal convenience or social boundaries; the key lesson is to "love your neighbor as yourself" by extending kindness to all people.
Key takeaways from the story:
Overcoming prejudice:
The Samaritan, typically considered an enemy by the Jews, demonstrates compassion towards a Jewish man in need, highlighting the importance of setting aside personal biases to help others.
Active compassion:
The story criticizes the religious leaders who passively walked by the injured man, emphasizing that true love requires action and not just good intentions.
Universal neighbor:
"Neighbor" is not limited to family or close friends; it encompasses anyone who needs assistance, regardless of their social status or background.
Responding to immediate needs:
The Samaritan didn't wait for someone else to help, he took immediate action to care for the injured man.
Sacrificial love:
The Samaritan went out of his way to help the injured man, even though it may have been inconvenient or costly, demonstrating a selfless act of love.
Biblical Generosity
There is much we can learn from this parable about biblical generosity. In fact, there are countless passages of scripture that don’t talk about money, but can still teach us a lot about generosity. Let’s look at five different lessons Jesus teaches us through the Parable of the Good Samaritan about living generously.
The Jews and Samaritans hated each other, and not in an “I don’t like your sports team” kind of way. The hatred was deep.
Jesus’s parable reveals that “Love your neighbor as yourself” is not just about those immediately around you or people you like. Your neighbors include all whom God has created in His image, regardless of gender, nationality, political affiliation, religious beliefs, or past decisions.
The character selection in this story was intentional. Biblical generosity doesn’t rule some people as worthy of generosity and others as unworthy. Christians are to be generous to all people. Our neighborhood is big. When God places people in need on our path, we are to treat them as a neighbor, loving them as ourselves. Biblical generosity is not picky.
We all get busy. We have errands to run, tasks to complete, people to see, and places to go. And we don’t like when our plans get derailed.
The Samaritan man was on his way to another place. He had other plans that day, and those plans did not include taking care of a beaten, bloody man. Yet, this Samaritan saw the man and stopped. Do not miss the importance of his stopping. The Samaritan’s stopping meant the day would not go according to plan. It may have meant he would postpone or be late for his next appointment. It may have meant a task would not be completed that day. And it likely meant he was going to be inconvenienced.
But he stopped. He stopped because he loved the beaten man as he loved himself. And if the Samaritan were the one beaten, he certainly would want someone to stop for him. The Samaritan took pity on the man, not his derailed plans. Biblical generosity can be inconvenient.
Often our generosity is a clean process. We go to our church website, find the “Give” link, fill out the form, send our electronic gift, and close our laptop. Clean.
The Parable of the Samaritan showcases a generosity that is anything but clean. The Samaritan’s generosity involved bloody bandages, placing a beaten man on a personal mode of transportation, and an open-ended financial commitment. The Samaritan’s generosity was involved. It was hands-on. It was messy.
There is a time for cleaner versions of generosity, where a button is clicked. While clean, generosity can still be sacrificial, cheerful, and eternally impactful. But God also desires us to be hands-on and engaged—personally helping the marginalized, homeless, suffering, and lost. It is a generosity that is anything but clean. Biblical generosity can be messy.
“If I do this, then I expect them to…”
You’ve heard this phrase. Maybe you’ve said something similar. Or maybe you’ve thought it. On one end is assistance, and on the other end is an expectation—an action for the benefit of the giver, not the recipient. An expectation of reciprocity turns generosity into a financial deal.
The elements we find in the Parable of the Good Samaritan are important, but so are the elements we do not find. While we read about inconvenient, messy generosity in the parable, we don’t read about an expectation of reciprocity. The only directive we discover is the Samaritan telling the innkeeper to do whatever it takes to care for the beaten man.
To be clear, setting requirements is not wrong in all situations. Sometimes, meeting standards can be beneficial for the recipient, like a church requiring a benevolence fund recipient to meet with a financial coach. But when we give, we should not expect reciprocity. We are giving a gift, not brokering an agreement. Biblical generosity is not a financial deal.
The sacrificial, grace-filled generosity demonstrated in the Parable of the Good Samaritan reminds us of God’s generosity. God, who owed us nothing, entered our mess and provided us salvation. We were broken and could do nothing on our own, so He did it all for us. He paid the full cost.
When we love our neighbor as ourselves and follow the generosity depicted by the Samaritan, we reflect God’s generosity toward a broken and lost world. We don’t always get to pick and choose who we help. Sometimes, God just puts a need before us, and we respond. Is it inconvenient? Often. Is it messy? Occasionally. Should there be expectations of reciprocity? Never.
This is what we see in Jesus’s parable. This is biblical generosity.